Giles Hussey vs Masamichi Imamura Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Wojtek Kolan
Published on 29 May at 12:52 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
G. Hussey vs M. Imamura

GBR
1
Win
Played
0
Win

JPN
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Hussey 1 - 0 Imamura
They have played 2 sets in total, with Giles Hussey winning 2 and Masamichi Imamura winning 0. The last match between Giles Hussey and Masamichi Imamura was at the Chisinau Challenger, 29-05-2025, Round: R2, Surface: Hard, with Giles Hussey getting the victory 7-5 6-3.
Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
---|---|
Hussey | 1 |
Imamura | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R2) Chisinau Challenger(05-29-25)
G. Hussey vs M. Imamura H2H Profile
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
$12,990 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
62.90% (195-115) | Career Total W/L | 57.86% (162-118) |
1 | Hard | 0 |
8 | Titles | 1 |
1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
G. Hussey vs M. Imamura Match Preview:
- Is there a significant difference in second serve performance? Interestingly, Imamura has won 47.22% of points on their second serve, while Hussey has a slightly higher percentage at 47.23%.
- Who excels in return game stats? Imamura appears stronger, winning 45.92% of opponents' second serve points compared to Hussey's 42.87%. Conversely, for first serve returns, Hussey slightly leads with 30.16% versus Imamura’s 29.93%.
- Under pressure, Hussey shows greater resilience, saving 53.41% of breakpoints, whereas Imamura manages 50%.
- Over the past year, match win rates favor Hussey at 61.7% over Imamura's 58.9%.
- Both players have their best surface win percentages on different grounds. Imamura shines on Indoor Hard with a 67% win rate, while Hussey’s strength lies on Hard with an identical 67% winning rate.
- Do they play at different levels? Both players compete generally in $10K events, with Hussey slightly ahead, winning 69.57% of his matches compared to Imamura’s 66.67%.
- Imamura has faced tougher competition on average, with opponents ranked 369.49, whereas Hussey's opposition average is 427.32.
- Imamura has a slight edge in deciding sets, triumphing in 55% of them, while Hussey manages a 50% success rate.
- In converting breakpoints, Imamura leads with 34.15%, over Hussey's 33.33%.
Editorial Prediction (May 29, 2025, UTC):
As the match approaches, both players demonstrate comparable skills, with Hussey having a marginally better second serve performance. However, Imamura shows greater proficiency in return games, which could be crucial in this matchup.
Historically, Hussey appears more adept under pressure and has a higher recent win rate. Yet, Imamura has faced more challenging opponents on average, which may provide valuable experience.
Considering the players’ effectiveness on particular surfaces, Imamura's win percentage on Indoor Hard aligns with the likely conditions of the upcoming match. Additionally, Imamura's slight edge in deciding set victories suggests a possible advantage if the match goes the distance.
Overall, aiming to predict the winner, Imamura is slightly favored to clinch the victory based on return capabilities and resilience against tougher competition.
Giles Hussey vs Masamichi Imamura Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
G. Hussey vs M. Imamura H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
2 | Sets Won | 0 |
13 | Games Won | 8 |
3 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
2 | Total Double Faults | 1 |
1:34:55 | Average Match Time | 1:34:55 |
58% (39/67) | 1st Serve % | 62% (42/68) |
59% (23/39) | 1st Serve Win % | 60% (25/42) |
61% (17/28) | 2nd Serve Win % | 46% (12/26) |
42% (5/12) | Break Pts Won % | 67% (2/3) |
46% (31/68) | Return Points Win % | 40% (27/67) |
100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
G. Hussey Recent Matches Played
M. Imamura Recent Matches Played

G. Hussey vs M. Imamura Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
62.90% (195/115) | YTD Win/Loss | 57.86% (162/118) |
59.72% (430/290) | Sets Win/Loss | 57.28% (358/267) |
53.63% (3663/3167) | Games Win/Loss | 53.29% (3108/2724) |
66.49% (129/65) | Hard Win/Loss | 58.37% (150/107) |
65.71% (23/12) | Clay Win/Loss | 42.86% (6/8) |
61.67% (37/23) | Indoor Hard W/L | 66.67% (6/3) |
28.57% (6/15) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
0.26 | Aces Per Game | 0.15 |
861 | Aces Total | 433 |
0.22 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.11 |
731 | Total Double Faults | 311 |
1:35:52 | Average Match Time | 1:10:35 |
467.63 | Average Opponent Rank | 449.8 |
62% (11798/18892) | 1st Serve % | 65% (8733/13339) |
67% (7932/11798) | 1st Serve Win % | 66% (5731/8733) |
51% (3605/7094) | 2nd Serve Win % | 49% (2276/4606) |
43% (886/2037) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 45% (647/1451) |
41% (7905/19186) | Return Points Win % | 42% (5694/13719) |
0.00% (0/1) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
40.00% (2/3) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
51.56% (33/31) | Challenger W/L | 40.00% (22/33) |
66.67% (160/80) | Futures W/L | 62.22% (140/85) |
63% (190/304) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 58% (161/278) |
75% (3/4) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
51% (46/91) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 53% (30/57) |
58% (57/98) | Deciding Set Win % | 48% (31/65) |
84% (190/160) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 89% (166/148) |
16% (190/30) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 11% (166/18) |
29% (120/35) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 12% (114/14) |